Older Adult Research Studies


Dr. Anne Dickerson has completed multiple studies and projects over the 30 years she has been in the Department of Occupational Therapy at ECU.  Select projects will be highlight with brief descriptions, links to publications or references, and/or link to documents to be shared with interested parties.

The Demonstration Project Promoting Highway Safety Program Guideline #13, funded for 4.5 years by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), 2017-2021, in which Dr. Dickerson was the Principal Investigator is fully described here.


Research Using GPS

Dr. Dickerson collaborated with members of Dunlap Associates, who received funded by NHTSA, to examine whether using GPS technology could improve safety for older adults.  While the project included two phases, there were actually four studies completed on this project; two studies were implemented by occupational therapy clinical scholars as their graduate thesis.

Project 1

Lauren Cochran completed her thesis in a study that used young adults to test both the driving routes for the GPS study, and the methods of evaluating the drivers’ performance for the funded project.  In addition, Lauren used the same tool to evaluate driving, using printed directions, on a driving simulator.  Thus, in addition to assisting in providing valuable feedback on the devised routes, she demonstrated the driving simulator can be used in lieu of on road driving evaluation.

Cochran, L.M. & Dickerson, A.E. (2019). Driving while navigating: On-road performance using GPS or printed instructions. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86 (1), 61-69. doi.org/10.1177%2F0008417419831390

Abstract:  Route navigation is a high-level skill and requires intact executive functioning to successfully find one’s way while driving in unfamiliar environments.

Purpose.  Driving performances were compared while navigating using electronic devices and printed directions on unfamiliar driving routes as well as in an interactive driving simulator.

Method. Twenty-four participants drove two on-road routes using GPS and printed directions, and navigated using printed directions in the simulator, using a point system to evaluate performance. The two unfamiliar routes, order of simulator and on-road driving, and use of GPS and printed directions were counterbalanced. Paired t test were used to compare both GPS versus printed directions and performance between on-road driving and the simulator.

Findings. Participants’ performance using GPS on the road was significantly better than with printed directions. There was no significant difference between performance in the simulator and on the road.

Implications. Using GPS may be an effective strategy for improving safety. Using a driving simulator may be an efficient means of evaluating the strategic level of driving, executive function, and readiness to drive.


Project 2

This project was the first and major phase of the NHTSA project. After pilot work with nine older adults, 80 older adults (40 in their 60’s & 40 in their 70’s) drove one familiar and three unfamiliar routes. Half of the participants had used GPS previously and half did not. Each participant drove one unfamiliar using GPS and one with written directions. Analysis found that everyone drover better with GPS than with written directions regardless if they had used GPS in the past or not!

Project 3

This was the second experiment of the NHTSA project – to explore how to train older adults who are unfamiliar with using GPS. While driving following GPS was not the problem, programming the device was. This study had 40 older adults, all unfamiliar with GPS. Half of them watched videos on how to use GPS, as well as program addresses into the GPS and half watched videos unrelated. Not surprising, the training group did better, but not as well as we expected.

Project 4

This prompted the fourth study by Chandler Coleman, an occupational therapy thesis student of Dr. Dickerson’s. She worked with 20 more older adults with no experience with GPS. She trained them with the videos and one-on-one hands on experience and feedback.  Guess which group did best!  The graph shows the outcome.  Those with one-to-one experience did significantly better than those with no training.



Project 2-4 are published in this paper:
Thomas, F.D., Dickerson, A.E., Graham, L.A., Coleman, M.C., Finstad, K.A., Blomberg, R.D., Wright, T.J. (2020). Teaching older drivers to navigate GPS technology. Journal of Safety Research, 72 (2), 165-171. doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.001.


Driving Check-Up:

Expanding the Continuum of Services for Older Drivers.

Dr. Anne Dickerson was the PI of this funded project from the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.  This two-year project developed a toolkit for driving schools to use to provide community living older adults with a “driving check-up”. The idea was that as one gets older, they may have some bad driving habits (e.g., rolling stop, not using turn signals) and/or not knowing new road design features (e.g., roundabout, lane channeling), and a one hour “check-up” would be a way to brush up on skills and knowledge – a hands-on driving safety class. The team created presentations, materials, and did training with several driving schools, both on site and remotely.  The report and materials are available on the AAAFTS site.


Dickerson, A.E., Davis, E.S., Stutts, J. & Wilkins, J. (2018).Development and Pilot Testing of the Driving Check-Up: Expanding the Continuum of Services Available to Assist Older Drivers (Technical Report). Washington, D.C.: AAA Foundation for Traffic Saftey.

Dickerson, A.E., Reistetter, T., Burhans, S. & Apple, K. (2015). Typical brake reaction times across the life span. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 30, 115-123.


There have been multiple research studies completed or in progress in the ROADI lab. Brake Reaction, Brake Force, Using a GPS, Naturalistic driving, Driving evaluations & Assessment Tools